Education resources › Blog › The link between Pre-Tests and Metacognition

The link between Pre-Tests and Metacognition

The link between Pre-Tests and Metacognition

4 min read
  • Metacognition
  • Questioning, Cold-Calling & Wait Times

Pre-tests (sometimes called pre-questions) and Metacognition are two areas of learning that are being increasingly studied by researchers. But could combining the two help teachers improve how much their students learn?

Pre-test involve asking students targeted questions before introducing new material. This technique primes their minds for learning by encouraging them to think critically about what they already know and what they need to learn next.

Metacognition, which is defined as the awareness and control of one’s own learning processes, allows students to monitor their understanding and regulate their study practices, thereby enhancing their academic performance. It provides a framework for improving learning outcomes across various contexts.

Integrating pre-questioning with metacognitive strategies can help educators create more effective learning environments. If you want to find out more about how these link, read on for:

  • Research behind pre-questioning and Metacognition
  • Is questioning a metacognitive strategy
  • Examples of metacognitive pre-question

The science behind pre-questioning and Metacognition

Rosenshines third Principle of Instruction encourages the idea of questions, as Rosenshine recommends teachers should ask large amounts of high quality questions and check the responses of all their students. Rosenshine found that the best teachers asked the most questions and further asked students how they got their answers.

Pre-questioning involves posing questions to students before introducing new content. This technique primes students’ minds, encouraging them to think about what they already know and what they need to learn. According to research, pre-questioning can significantly enhance memory retention and understanding. When students anticipate questions, they are more likely to engage in active thinking, which activates their metacognitive skills.

Research has also investigated the influences of enhances metacognitive awareness on educational achievement.  The study found that students who received structured metacognitive guidance performed significantly better in terms of academic achievement compared to those who did not receive such support. This indicates that explicit instruction in metacognitive strategies can enhance learning outcomes.

Considering the effectiveness of both strategies, research investigated the link between metacognition and pre-questioning, and whether enhanced metacognition improved pre-questioning outcomes. The study found that when students were provided with self-regulation support, their metacognitive awareness of the benefits of pretesting improved. This suggests that pre-questioning, combined with guidance on self-regulation, can enhance students’ ability to monitor and control their learning processes.

High-impact CPD made easy. Develop evidence-informed CPD at your school, using our exclusive online collection of courses and resources.

Questioning as a metacognitive strategy

Is questioning a metacognitive strategy? The answer is rather interesting. Questioning prompts students to reflect on their understanding and identify gaps in their knowledge. When students ask themselves questions, they engage in metacognitive monitoring, which involves assessing their comprehension and adjusting their learning strategies accordingly.

Studies have shown that questioning can significantly enhance metacognitive processes. A recent study highlighted that self-questioning techniques help students better monitor their understanding and adapt their learning approaches. This method not only promotes deeper cognitive engagement but also fosters greater academic achievement.

Further research confirms that when students employ questioning strategies, they are more likely to identify misconceptions and adjust their study methods to improve learning outcomes. This self-regulatory behavior is essential for effective learning and long-term retention of information.

Examples of metacognitive pre-questioning

To put this into practice, consider the following examples of pre-questioning and metacognitive strategies:

  1. Reflective Questions: After a lesson, asking students, “What did I find challenging about this topic?” or “What strategies did I use to understand the material?”. Research shows Engaging students in self-reflective questioning helps solidify existing knowledge and enhances their ability to transfer information to new contexts.
  2. Predictive Questions: Before starting a new chapter, pose questions like, “What do I already know about this topic?” or “What do I expect to learn?” Research indicates that activating prior knowledge through predictive questioning is crucial for schema activation and the integration of new information into long-term memory.
  3. Evaluative Questions: Encourage students to ask themselves, “How well do I understand this concept?” or “What areas do I need to review?” A study  demonstrated that self-evaluative questioning plays a significant role in metacognitive monitoring and self-regulated learning.

By incorporating these types of questions, students can develop their metacognitive skills and become more self-aware learners.

Final thoughts

Incorporating pre-questioning and metacognitive strategies in the classroom can significantly impact students’ learning outcomes. By fostering an environment that supports self-regulated learning, teachers can empower students to take charge of their education and develop critical thinking skills.

Encouraging students to embrace questioning, allows them to reflect on their learning, and continuously strive for improvement. By doing so, you’ll not only enhance their academic performance but also help improve their metacognitive development.


About the editor

Bradley Busch

Bradley Busch

Bradley Busch is a Chartered Psychologist and a leading expert on illuminating Cognitive Science research in education. As Director at InnerDrive, his work focuses on translating complex psychological research in a way that is accessible and helpful. He has delivered thousands of workshops for educators and students, helping improve how they think, learn and perform. Bradley is also a prolific writer: he co-authored four books including Evidence-Informed Wisdom, Teaching & Learning Illuminated and The Science of Learning, as well as regularly featuring in publications such as The Guardian and The Telegraph.

Follow on XConnect on LinkedIn